Tensions between India and Pakistan have once again escalated following a series of missile and bomb strikes across the contested region of Kashmir and inside Pakistani territory. India’s latest strikes, aimed at targets in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir, prompted Pakistan’s leadership to denounce the attacks as an act of war. With both nations being nuclear-armed rivals, the conflict has sparked global concern over the potential for wider escalation.
While the strikes and counterstrikes made headlines worldwide, what has further fueled confusion is the wave of disinformation surrounding the conflict. The Soufan Center, a global security think tank, noted that the internet has been “flooded with disinformation, false claims, and manipulated photos and videos,” making it difficult to separate fact from propaganda. Both nations have released limited information, creating a fog of war in which each side seeks to preserve national pride and control the narrative.
Read More: MCB Islamic Bank Opens New Branch at Dolmen Mall Lahore
Pakistan Claims to Down Five Indian Aircraft
Hours after India launched its airstrikes, Pakistan’s military claimed to have shot down five Indian fighter jets. According to Pakistan’s military spokesperson Lt. Gen. Ahmed Sharif, the aircraft included three French-made Rafales, one Russian-made Su-30MKI, and one Russian-made MiG-29. He added that Pakistan’s Air Force suffered no casualties and that all its aircraft returned safely to base.
Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif echoed this claim, asserting that Pakistan’s Air Force could have destroyed up to ten Indian jets but exercised restraint by targeting only those directly involved in attacking Pakistani positions. He further claimed that 80 Indian aircraft participated in the offensive.
India, however, has not acknowledged any such losses. While debris from three aircraft has been reported in separate locations, New Delhi has avoided confirming whether they belonged to its fleet.
Did the Clash Unfold That Way?
India operates all three aircraft types mentioned in Pakistan’s claims—Rafale, Su-30MKI, and MiG-29—within its 700-plus combat-capable fighter jets. These planes are versatile, capable of both air-to-air combat and ground strikes.
Interestingly, both India and Pakistan insist their aircraft never crossed into each other’s sovereign airspace. This suggests that, if Pakistan’s account is accurate, its pilots may have launched long-range air-to-air missiles from within their territory rather than engaging in close-range dogfights. Such a scenario would explain why no eyewitness accounts or reliable social media videos of aerial battles have surfaced, despite the large-scale mobilization.
Another possibility is that Pakistan relied on surface-to-air missiles (SAMs) to bring down Indian aircraft. Given the effectiveness of SAM systems in conflicts like the war in Ukraine, this remains a credible theory, particularly since Pakistan possesses a robust stockpile of Chinese-made missile defense systems.
Chinese Jets and Missiles in Focus
The incident has also highlighted Pakistan’s growing reliance on Chinese-made military hardware. The country’s air force operates a diverse fleet, including U.S.-made F-16s, French Mirage fighters, and Chinese-built J-10C and JF-17 jets. Pakistan’s arsenal also features advanced Chinese air-to-air missiles such as the PL-12 and PL-15, both capable of striking targets beyond visual range.
Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar informed parliament that it was the J-10C that downed Indian aircraft, suggesting Chinese missiles were likely used. Security analyst Lisa Curtis of the Center for a New American Security noted that this marked a shift from 2019, when a U.S.-supplied F-16 was reportedly used in a similar confrontation. “It’s telling that Pakistan is leaning more on Chinese equipment than it did six years ago,” she observed.
This reliance had immediate financial ripples. Shares in AVIC Chengdu Aircraft, the Chinese manufacturer behind the J-10C and JF-17, surged on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange. Conversely, Dassault Aviation, the French company producing the Rafale jet, saw its stock dip sharply before recovering.
India’s Official Position
India has refrained from disclosing the exact aircraft or assets deployed in the strikes. The Defense Ministry stated only that the operation targeted nine sites used for planning terrorist attacks against India. At a press briefing, Indian officials released footage of eight strikes—four in Pakistan-administered Kashmir and four within Pakistan itself.
India emphasized that the strikes were “precision attacks,” and the video evidence appeared to show missiles and bombs targeting specific facilities rather than wide-area bombardments. This aligns with India’s longstanding strategy of portraying such operations as defensive counterterrorism measures rather than acts of aggression against Pakistan.
Civilian Casualties and Damage Reported
Pakistan, however, presented a very different narrative. Officials reported that 31 civilians, including women and children, were killed in the strikes. Damaged sites allegedly included residential buildings and two mosques in Pakistan-administered Kashmir and Punjab province.
While India disputes these claims, the casualty reports have fueled outrage within Pakistan, strengthening the government’s position that India’s actions amounted to “unprovoked aggression.”
Drone Warfare Escalates
The conflict entered a new phase when India deployed multiple attack drones into Pakistani territory the day after the airstrikes. Pakistan claimed to have shot down 29 drones, most of them identified as Israeli-made Harop loitering munitions.
Despite Pakistan’s claims, some drones did manage to hit targets. One struck a military facility near Lahore, injuring four soldiers, while another hit Rawalpindi, adjacent to Islamabad. India did not deny the use of drones, but stated its forces had targeted Pakistani air defense systems and radar installations.
Drone warfare has become a central feature of modern conflicts, offering militaries the ability to strike with precision while reducing risks to pilots. India’s use of Israeli technology underscores its own diverse international military partnerships, contrasting with Pakistan’s increasing reliance on Chinese systems.
Ground Skirmishes Along the Line of Control
Beyond the air and drone battles, fighting intensified along the Line of Control (LoC), the de facto border in Kashmir. Pakistan claimed its forces killed 50–60 Indian soldiers during exchanges of fire, while India reported the death of one soldier from Pakistani shelling. Neither side has released verifiable evidence of the casualties, but the clashes highlight the persistent volatility along the LoC.
Adding to the tension, India accused Pakistan of launching missile strikes toward Amritsar, a major Indian city near the border. Pakistan’s Information Minister Attaullah Tarar denied the charge, claiming instead that an Indian drone had crashed in the area.
Global Implications
The ongoing confrontation underscores how India and Pakistan’s decades-old rivalry continues to evolve with modern technology. Chinese missiles, French jets, and Israeli drones have all played a role in the latest conflict, reflecting both nations’ diverse defense partnerships.
For Pakistan, showcasing Chinese-built systems demonstrates its strategic pivot toward Beijing. For India, deploying Israeli drones and French aircraft underlines its multi-directional defense strategy. These developments not only carry military significance but also reshape global arms markets, as seen in the immediate stock market reactions.
The bigger concern, however, lies in escalation risks. Both India and Pakistan are nuclear powers, and even limited conventional clashes carry the danger of spiraling into a larger conflict. With disinformation muddying the waters and political leaders under pressure to show strength, the possibility of miscalculation remains high.
Frequently Asked Questions:
Why did India strike targets in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir?
India launched the strikes in response to terrorist attacks in Indian-controlled Kashmir, which New Delhi claimed were planned across the border.
How many Indian aircraft did Pakistan claim to have shot down?
Pakistan’s military claimed to have downed five Indian fighter jets, including three Rafales, a Su-30MKI, and a MiG-29. India has not confirmed these losses.
What role did Chinese weapons play in the clash?
Pakistan stated that its Chinese-made J-10C jets and Chinese missiles were involved in downing Indian aircraft, reflecting its reliance on Beijing’s defense technology.
Did drones play a part in the India-Pakistan confrontation?
Yes. India deployed Israeli-made Harop drones in strikes against Pakistan. Pakistan claimed to have shot down 29 drones, though some managed to hit targets near Lahore and Rawalpindi.
Were civilians affected by the strikes?
Pakistan reported that 31 civilians, including women and children, were killed in Indian strikes. India has not confirmed these claims, saying its operations were precision-targeted against militant infrastructure.
Did India admit any aircraft or drone losses?
India has not acknowledged losing aircraft or drones, though debris from three aircraft was found in multiple areas.
Why is disinformation such a problem in this conflict?
Both India and Pakistan released limited details, while manipulated videos and false claims circulated online. Analysts warn this “information warfare” makes it difficult to know the full truth.
Conclusion
The recent India-Pakistan clash underscores how rapidly evolving military technology is reshaping traditional conflicts. Chinese missiles, French jets, Israeli drones, and Russian aircraft all played roles, turning South Asia’s decades-long rivalry into a modern battlefield that blends precision strikes with information warfare. While both nations continue to dispute the scale of damage and losses, one fact remains clear: the region sits on a knife’s edge. With both countries possessing nuclear weapons, even limited escalations risk spiraling into a wider conflict.
